-
blaktivist reblogged this from ta-ta-ta-thea and added:
You have to confront folks with their wrongdoing if you expect to ever see each other eye to eye. @thea-renee:
-
ta-ta-ta-thea reblogged this from crunkfeministcollective and added:
While I do appreciate this for the information it provides, I think it’s a little misleading. First of all, “medical” is...
-
mickyalexandria reblogged this from crunkfeministcollective
-
blkcowrie liked this
-
blkcowrie reblogged this from crunkfeministcollective
-
singkrenisite liked this
-
ronronnement liked this
-
olsoulnugrowth liked this
-
imstillnotcomingbackmffw reblogged this from crunkfeministcollective
-
complex-brown liked this
-
crunkfeministcollective reblogged this from blaktivist
-
blaktivist posted this
Occupy… the C-Suite?
While I do appreciate this for the information it provides, I think it’s a little misleading.
First of all, “medical” is a pretty broad category. Are we talking doctors? Plastic surgeons? Medical/pharmaceutical company execs? Because I know it doesn’t include most of the individuals I know that work in the medical field.
Secondly, I think that by trying to identify the 1% as some categorical group we are denying them their personhood. They are individuals as well. And I truly believe that the vast majority of them mean no intentional harm to the rest of us. I think it’s an issue of ignoring the problem rather than actively creating it.
I think that the power of the 99% movement comes from the fact that it demonstrates how the experiences of the 99% are all so different, and yet we can all relate to them or empathize. Seeing the 1% as some faceless enemy that we can fit in a box is not only inaccurate, it’s self-defeating if we ever hope to come together and work towards solutions as 100%.
(via crunkfeministcollective)


